Damn you, Napier!

Briggs‘ logarithms (often mistakenly understood to be Napier‘s logarithms) is such an useful function that most of us don’t really think about it, until we have to. Everyone’s familiar with its properties:

(1)

but suddenly,

What can we do with this last one?

One thing is that we can still break it into a product-like form:

and use (1) to get

 (5)

If is much smaller than , then we can simplify (5) by dropping the term because and that may be appropriate given the context.

If we do not want to drop entirely the term, then we can use Mercator’s series:

We can then write

(and plugging-in Mercartor’s series for the second part:)

Truncating at a few terms, we get

which gives a rather good approximation whenever is significantly smaller than (but not infinitesimally so).

*
* *

The form comes up more often than I’d like in my calculations, and I always find it rather annoying because I know no good way to break it or approximate it satisfactorily. Other expansions lead to equations of the form where is an infinite degree polynomial-like object that mostly misbehaves and needs a lots of terms to start looking like it’s going to converge: it’s unstable numerically.